Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
owl:sameAs
Inference Rule:
b3s
b3sifp
dbprdf-label
facets
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#
http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
ldp
oplweb
skos-trans
virtrdf-label
None
About:
The scientific basis for currently proposed management options for Hector’s and Maui dolphins: a critique
Goto
Sponge
NotDistinct
Permalink
An Entity of Type :
schema:ScholarlyArticle
, within Data Space :
covidontheweb.inria.fr
associated with source
document(s)
Type:
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
New Facet based on Instances of this Class
Attributes
Values
type
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy
Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title
The scientific basis for currently proposed management options for Hector’s and Maui dolphins: a critique
Creator
Dawson, Stephen
Slooten, Elisabeth
source
BioRxiv
abstract
New Zealand’s Ministry for Primary Industries (MPI) developed a risk analysis for Hector’s and Maui dolphins, in order to inform protection options being considered by the Ministers of Fisheries and Conservation. Unfortunately, MPI’s risk analysis combines several estimates that are biased, and the biases consistently act together to underestimate the level of bycatch and overestimate the species’ ability to sustain impacts. In essence, the approach uses abundance estimates that are likely biased high, multiplies them by a reproductive rate that has been arbitrarily raised, multiplied by an assumed figure for calf survival, to reach a number of dolphins that would be added each year if the population were to remain stable. From this number, they subtract their estimates of bycatch, which are almost certainly biased low. The remaining number of dolphins is apportioned a cause of death according to autopsy data from 55 Hector’s and Maui dolphins found dead on beaches. This is then compared to estimates of what level of takes would be sustainable, calculated using a formula that is not well understood and less conservative than the international standard (PBR, developed by the US National Marine Fisheries Service). This is a poor basis for rational management of an endangered, endemic marine mammal. A key problem with the MPI approach is that its definition of “risk” does not relate to the risk of population decline or extinction, and is inconsistent with the modern understanding of the behaviour of meta-populations. The approach defines risk as the likelihood of capture, which is apportioned to different areas according to fishing effort and the habitat model’s outputs for dolphin distribution. The protection options are therefore targeted where high densities of dolphins and high fishing effort coincide. Large populations are allocated the highest level of protection, while small populations remain poorly protected. This approach is likely to increase the risk of local extinctions, contractions of dolphin distribution, population fragmentation, loss of genetic variability and result in increased risk to the species as a whole. Many of these points were made by an International Expert Panel in 2018. MPI have failed to provide a list of recommendations from the Expert Panel Report with their responses (if any) to those recommendations. This standard step in scientific practice, following peer review (e.g. response to reviewers’ comments) has not been followed.
has issue date
2020-05-17
(
xsd:dateTime
)
bibo:doi
10.1101/2020.05.15.098889
has license
biorxiv
sha1sum (hex)
fc438049780f4248683550e77739161a7fa2035b
schema:url
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.05.15.098889
resource representing a document's title
The scientific basis for currently proposed management options for Hector’s and Maui dolphins: a critique
schema:publication
bioRxiv
resource representing a document's body
covid:fc438049780f4248683550e77739161a7fa2035b#body_text
is
schema:about
of
named entity 'apportioned'
named entity 'risk'
named entity 'Conservation'
named entity 'dolphins'
named entity 'scientific'
»more»
◂◂ First
◂ Prev
Next ▸
Last ▸▸
Page 1 of 7
Go
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Content Formats:
RDF
ODATA
Microdata
About
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software