Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
owl:sameAs
Inference Rule:
b3s
b3sifp
dbprdf-label
facets
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#
http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
ldp
oplweb
skos-trans
virtrdf-label
None
About:
Sample pooling methods for efficient pathogen screening: Practical implications
Goto
Sponge
NotDistinct
Permalink
An Entity of Type :
schema:ScholarlyArticle
, within Data Space :
covidontheweb.inria.fr
associated with source
document(s)
Type:
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
New Facet based on Instances of this Class
Attributes
Values
type
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy
Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title
Sample pooling methods for efficient pathogen screening: Practical implications
Creator
Hepp, Crystal
Cocking, Jill
Fofanov, Viacheslav
Furstenau, Tara
source
BioRxiv
abstract
Due to the large number of negative tests, individually screening large populations for rare pathogens can be wasteful and expensive. Sample pooling methods improve the efficiency of large-scale pathogen screening campaigns by reducing the number of tests and reagents required to accurately categorize positive and negative individuals. Such methods rely on group testing theory which mainly focuses on minimizing the total number of tests; however, many other practical concerns and tradeoffs must be considered when choosing an appropriate method for a given set of circumstances. Here we use computational simulations to determine how several theoretical approaches compare in terms of (a) the number of tests, to minimize costs and save reagents, (b) the number of sequential steps, to reduce the time it takes to complete the assay, (c) the number of samples per pool, to avoid the limits of detection, (d) simplicity, to reduce the risk of human error, and (e) robustness, to poor estimates of the number of positive samples. We found that established methods often perform very well in one area but very poorly in others. Therefore, we introduce and validate a new method which performs fairly well across each of the above criteria making it a good general use approach.
has issue date
2020-07-16
(
xsd:dateTime
)
bibo:doi
10.1101/2020.07.16.206060
has license
biorxiv
sha1sum (hex)
d401d82f5a10c19bc0145ffc12a15f560232e255
schema:url
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.07.16.206060
resource representing a document's title
Sample pooling methods for efficient pathogen screening: Practical implications
schema:publication
bioRxiv
resource representing a document's body
covid:d401d82f5a10c19bc0145ffc12a15f560232e255#body_text
is
schema:about
of
named entity 'rapid'
named entity 'large'
named entity 'computational'
named entity 'sample'
named entity 'positive'
»more»
◂◂ First
◂ Prev
Next ▸
Last ▸▸
Page 1 of 3
Go
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Content Formats:
RDF
ODATA
Microdata
About
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software