Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
owl:sameAs
Inference Rule:
b3s
b3sifp
dbprdf-label
facets
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#
http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
ldp
oplweb
skos-trans
virtrdf-label
None
About:
From Bad to Worse: Airline Boarding Changes in Response to COVID-19
Goto
Sponge
NotDistinct
Permalink
An Entity of Type :
schema:ScholarlyArticle
, within Data Space :
covidontheweb.inria.fr
associated with source
document(s)
Type:
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
New Facet based on Instances of this Class
Attributes
Values
type
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy
Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title
From Bad to Worse: Airline Boarding Changes in Response to COVID-19
Creator
Islam, T
Mubayi, A
Namilae, S
Sadeghi Lahijani, M
Scotch, M
»more»
source
ArXiv
abstract
Airlines have introduced a back-to-front boarding process in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. It is motivated by the desire to reduce passengers' likelihood of passing close to seated passengers when they take their seats. However, our prior work on the risk of Ebola spread in airplanes suggested that the driving force for increased exposure to infection transmission risk is the clustering of passengers while waiting for others to stow their luggage and take their seats. In this work, we examine whether the new boarding processes lead to increased or decreased risk of infection spread. We also study the reasons behind the risk differences associated with different boarding processes. We accomplish this by simulating the new boarding processes using pedestrian dynamics and compare them against alternatives. Our results show that back-to-front boarding roughly doubles the infection exposure compared with random boarding. It also increases exposure by around 50% compared to a typical boarding process prior to the outbreak of COVID-19. While keeping middle seats empty yields a substantial reduction in exposure, our results show that the different boarding processes have similar relative strengths in this case as with middle seats occupied. We show that the increased exposure arises from the proximity between passengers moving in the aisle and while seated. Our results suggest that airlines either revert to their earlier boarding process or adopt the better random process.
has issue date
2020-06-04
(
xsd:dateTime
)
has license
arxiv
sha1sum (hex)
a40211fd1a2bd4e1a48d992db0396aa152951532
resource representing a document's title
From Bad to Worse: Airline Boarding Changes in Response to COVID-19
resource representing a document's body
covid:a40211fd1a2bd4e1a48d992db0396aa152951532#body_text
is
schema:about
of
named entity 'compare'
named entity 'Our'
named entity 'reduction'
named entity 'moving'
named entity 'compared'
»more»
◂◂ First
◂ Prev
Next ▸
Last ▸▸
Page 1 of 3
Go
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Content Formats:
RDF
ODATA
Microdata
About
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software