Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
owl:sameAs
Inference Rule:
b3s
b3sifp
dbprdf-label
facets
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#
http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
ldp
oplweb
skos-trans
virtrdf-label
None
About:
How much of SARS-CoV-2 Infections is India detecting? A model-based estimation
Goto
Sponge
NotDistinct
Permalink
An Entity of Type :
schema:ScholarlyArticle
, within Data Space :
covidontheweb.inria.fr
associated with source
document(s)
Type:
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
New Facet based on Instances of this Class
Attributes
Values
type
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy
Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title
How much of SARS-CoV-2 Infections is India detecting? A model-based estimation
Creator
James, K
Goli, Srinivas
source
MedRxiv
abstract
Background and Rationale: Amid SARS-CoV-2 outbreak, the low number of infections for a population size of 1.38 billion is widely discussed, but with no definite answers. Methods: We used the model proposed by Bommer and Vollmer to assess the quality of official case records. The infection fatality rates were taken from Verity et al (2020). Age distribution of the population for India and states are taken from the Census of India (2011). Reported number of deaths and SARS-CoV-2 confirmed cases from https://www.covid19india.org. The reported numbers of samples tests were collected from the reports of the Indian Council for Medical Research (ICMR). Results: The findings suggest that India is detecting just 3.6% of the total number of infections with a huge variation across its states. Among 13 states which have more than 100 COVID-19 cases, the detection rate varies from 81.9% (of 410 estimated infections) in Kerala to 0.8% (of 35487 estimated infections) in Madhya Pradesh and 2.4% (of 7431 estimated infections) in Gujarat. Conclusion: As the study reports a lower number of deaths and higher recovery rates in the states with a high detection rate, thus suggest that India must enhance its testing capacity and go for widespread testing. Late detection puts patients in greater need of mechanical ventilation and ICU care, which imposes greater costs on the health system. The country should also adopt population-level random testing to assess the prevalence of the infection.
has issue date
2020-04-11
(
xsd:dateTime
)
bibo:doi
10.1101/2020.04.09.20059014
has license
medrxiv
sha1sum (hex)
8faef058c3285747d30fb18a1cbfa803ac3736c8
schema:url
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.04.09.20059014
resource representing a document's title
How much of SARS-CoV-2 Infections is India detecting? A model-based estimation
resource representing a document's body
covid:8faef058c3285747d30fb18a1cbfa803ac3736c8#body_text
is
schema:about
of
named entity 'patients'
named entity 'FOUND'
named entity 'WIDESPREAD'
named entity 'BUT'
named entity 'CARE'
»more»
◂◂ First
◂ Prev
Next ▸
Last ▸▸
Page 1 of 3
Go
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Content Formats:
RDF
ODATA
Microdata
About
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software