Facets (new session)
Description
Metadata
Settings
owl:sameAs
Inference Rule:
b3s
b3sifp
dbprdf-label
facets
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/dbpedia#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/opencyc#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/umbel#
http://dbpedia.org/resource/inference/rules/yago#
http://dbpedia.org/schema/property_rules#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/SUMO#
http://www.ontologyportal.org/inference/rules/WordNet#
http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#
ldp
oplweb
skos-trans
virtrdf-label
None
About:
Experimental comparison of material removal rates in abrasive waterjet cutting and a novel droplet stream technique
Goto
Sponge
NotDistinct
Permalink
An Entity of Type :
schema:ScholarlyArticle
, within Data Space :
covidontheweb.inria.fr
associated with source
document(s)
Type:
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
New Facet based on Instances of this Class
Attributes
Values
type
Academic Article
research paper
schema:ScholarlyArticle
isDefinedBy
Covid-on-the-Web dataset
title
Experimental comparison of material removal rates in abrasive waterjet cutting and a novel droplet stream technique
Creator
Demian, Sohani
Kinsey, Brad
Korkolis, Yannis
Mitchell, Benjamin
source
Elsevier
abstract
Abstract The use of abrasive waterjets (AWJ) to machine metal surfaces is prevalent through-out industry. AWJ requires the purchase and disposal of costly abrasive particles which increases manufacturing costs and environmental-footprint. This motivates the exploration for low-cost, eco-friendly alternatives. A novel method which utilizes a stream of high-speed water droplets (WD) travelling through a sub-atmospheric pressure environment to remove material without using abrasive grit is presented. In this paper, the efficacy of this new process is investigated and compared to AWJ and pure water jet (WJ) (i.e., without abrasive particles) by measuring the material removal rates (MRR) of each process on a hard-to-machine steel, DP 1180, for equivalent water-flow conditions. Trench profiles are created by traversing each of the jets across a metal sample, from which the MRR and trench profiles are obtained. The MRR results reveal that WD is significantly faster than WJ, but is subordinate compared to AWJ for MRR efficiency. This identifies a trade-off between manufacturing cost and time.
has issue date
2020-12-31
(
xsd:dateTime
)
bibo:doi
10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.085
has license
els-covid
sha1sum (hex)
0b5320dec59c79e5bb3de7ecbff48016a7c3bee2
schema:url
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2020.05.085
resource representing a document's title
Experimental comparison of material removal rates in abrasive waterjet cutting and a novel droplet stream technique
schema:publication
Procedia Manufacturing
resource representing a document's body
covid:0b5320dec59c79e5bb3de7ecbff48016a7c3bee2#body_text
is
schema:about
of
named entity 'MRR'
named entity 'identifies'
named entity 'measuring'
named entity 'process'
named entity 'WATER DROPLETS'
»more»
◂◂ First
◂ Prev
Next ▸
Last ▸▸
Page 1 of 4
Go
Faceted Search & Find service v1.13.91 as of Mar 24 2020
Alternative Linked Data Documents:
Sponger
|
ODE
Content Formats:
RDF
ODATA
Microdata
About
OpenLink Virtuoso
version 07.20.3229 as of Jul 10 2020, on Linux (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu), Single-Server Edition (94 GB total memory)
Data on this page belongs to its respective rights holders.
Virtuoso Faceted Browser Copyright © 2009-2025 OpenLink Software